Think about what actually makes learning work. Being asked to explain your reasoning out loud. Practicing a difficult conversation and getting it wrong safely. Defending a decision to someone who pushes back. Arguing a case with people who see it differently. Online, almost none of this happens. Learners read, watch, click, and type — and then submit something at the end. The program isn't bad. It's just thinner than the one you'd run if everyone were in a room together.
Written assignments stopped being reliable evidence the moment learners got AI tools. Grading is slow, expensive, and comes out differently depending on who did it. What you're left with is a submission and a score, and no idea what went on behind either.
You deliver your program online, and how good it is decides whether you win the next contract or keep this one.
You design something once and adapt it client after client. Your most senior people spend their weeks facilitating sessions that don't need their expertise.
You run online and blended programs, you move faster than the rest of the institution, and you're judged on what you actually deliver.
Solo activities
AI-guided reflection that’s hard to outsource—and easy to assess.
What it replaces: static written reflections & take-home essays
Ideal for:
Individual Activities
Small group activities
Seminar-quality peer learning—without scheduling chaos or extra staff.
What learners do: small-group discussion moderated by an AI facilitator
Ideal for:
Team Activities
Define the goal, prompts, rules, roles (if needed), and a rubric focused on reasoning and collaboration quality.
Activities live directly inside the learning flow via standard LMS integration. Learners see clear instructions and the rubric before starting.
Reflect runs 1:1 guided reflection. Connect runs structured small-group sessions with equitable participation and on-task flow.
Assessment, feedback, transcripts, and cohort analytics are captured automatically—so teams can validate quality and continuously improve.
A general AI assistant answers whatever it's asked. This follows the structure you built — your situation, your questions, your standard — and holds every learner to it.
It speaks, asks the next question, and decides who hasn't contributed yet. That's a different thing from a tool that records a session and marks the transcript later.
Learners reach it from inside the course they're already in, and grades land in your gradebook. Nobody copies anything anywhere.
Where the cohort struggled, what came up repeatedly, who needs help. That's the part you hand to whoever paid for the program.
Most platforms track either participation or a learning score. We go further measuring participation, engagement, and rubric based learning outcomes, giving you a full picture of learner success.
human2human.ai is built by the team behind Edunext, which has run online learning infrastructure for universities, governments and training providers across Latin America, Europe and North America since 2013.
“Teaching English as a Second Language to over 100 learners has always been a challenge, especially keeping them engaged in group discussions. With human2human.ai, everything changed. The AI-facilitated sessions ensured every student participated, stayed on track, and received real-time feedback. Engagement skyrocketed, and the learning outcomes were outstanding. This tool has truly transformed the way I teach.”
ESL Educator
"In just two days, we accomplished what would normally have taken us weeks. Human2Human.ai made it possible for every member of our team to contribute their perspective in a simple, guided, and meaningful way. The result was a 92 % participation rate, clear and organized insights ready for strategy, and more than 57 hours saved for our Human Talent team — but most importantly, a renewed sense of connection and shared purpose across Edunext."
Human Talent Manager, edunext
No. human2human.ai adds activities inside the LMS an organization already runs. It does not host courses, store content, manage enrolment or issue credentials. Organizations keep Moodle, Open edX, Canvas or whatever platform they currently use.
No. An AI tutor explains material to a learner who is stuck. human2human.ai facilitates an activity the learner is being asked to perform — arguing a case, defending a decision, conducting a difficult conversation — and assesses how they did. The AI asks the questions rather than answering them.
Three differences. A general assistant follows wherever the learner leads; a human2human.ai activity follows the structure the designer built and holds every learner to the same standard. A general assistant produces no assessment; human2human.ai scores each learner against the designer’s rubric and passes grades into the institution’s gradebook. And a general assistant tells you nothing about a cohort; human2human.ai analyses every session together to show what a whole group did and did not understand.
A discussion forum collects written posts asynchronously and nobody moderates the quality of the exchange. human2human.ai Connect runs a live session with video and audio in which an AI facilitator keeps the group to the designed structure, allocates turns, and assesses participation against a rubric. Forums produce text; Connect produces a facilitated conversation and evidence of how each participant reasoned.
No, and it is deliberately not competing in that category. Proctoring and detection tools try to police a traditional assessment format. human2human.ai changes the format instead: a learner reasoning out loud in an unscripted conversation, with follow-up questions based on what they just said, is a fundamentally different task from submitting a document that an AI could have produced.
Yes. human2human.ai integrates with Moodle through LTI, the standard mechanism for connecting external learning tools to a course. Learners launch the activity from inside the Moodle course and scores return to the Moodle gradebook. It also works with Canvas, Open edX and any other LTI compliant LMS.
Yes. An activity can be shared as a direct link, which suits organizations running programs outside a formal LMS or piloting before integrating.
Oral exams, oral defenses, role plays, scenario simulations, interview practice, guided reflection, case analysis and structured journaling as solo activities; debates, case discussions, group problem solving, peer review, collaborative analysis and world cafés as live group sessions. The activity is defined by the designer rather than chosen from a fixed catalogue.
The organization’s own learning designer or instructor. They define the objective, the situation or case, the questions worth asking, the flow of the activity, the instructions the AI facilitator follows, and the rubric that defines what a strong or weak answer looks like. The platform assists in building it, but the pedagogical decisions are the designer’s.
Reflect is a solo activity: one learner has the conversation with the AI facilitator on their own, at whatever time suits them, with nothing to schedule. Connect is a live small-group session: several learners join at a chosen time slot with video and audio, and the AI facilitator moderates the discussion between them. Both use the same activity designer, the same rubric-based assessment and the same LMS integration.
The interface is localized in English and Spanish. Facilitator voice engines are also optimizes for these 2 languages. Text base activities can run in a larger set of languages based on areunderlying models support, though depth varies by language.
Organizations receive alerts as they approach their allowance. By default, activities continue past the allowance at a published rate invoiced afterwards, so learners are never cut off mid-program. Organizations that need a guaranteed ceiling — for example on a fixed government contract — can enable a hard stop instead.
Still Have Questions? Get in Touch!
Human2Human introduces the Active Learning Layer for modern online education—
making deep thinking, peer interaction, and measurable learning possible at scale.
Run a focused pilot in one course or program and see how structured, AI-facilitated learning changes engagement, interaction, and evidence of learning. No platform migration required.
This is not another discussion tool or AI chatbot. Human2Human activities are intentionally designed learning experiences—with clear objectives, structured flow, and rubric-aligned outcomes.
Active learning no longer requires constant instructor presence. Once an activity is designed, the system facilitates it consistently across cohorts, programs, and institutions.
Finally see how learners actually think, interact, and improve. Participation, reasoning quality, and collaboration become visible and measurable.
